The graphics are equal or better than COD2; I have all my video settings on Medium for faster loading times, hence the shit texture quality. Draw distance does fail badly, every map has some sort of fog to cover it up, but we all know EA suck ass. Excellent style of gameplay, just need more variety of gameplay types in future. It's obvious EA fluked it and didn't put much thought into it because of how buggy it is without patch. Other problems: horrid loading times, shitty single player, glitchy stuff, different servers have different rego, bad physics but compared to cod4, BF2 all the way.
Ok, graphics similar at best, but guess what? cod2 has widescreen, it has AA, does bf2? no fuckin way in other words, YES the graphics are better. hell, even cod1 has widescreen ffs...
Gameplay is horrid due to lack of headshots, shitty sniping, lack of physics(lol). Il admit it it was a good idea for a game, always has but EA are just too pathetic to publish any decent games.
OMG the lack of AA
Are you serious?
Im pretty sure he is....

Ppl on decent rigs and high rez like to hav AA to make it look better to improve their experience of the game, u cant blame him for wanting his time on that game to b better